Exploring an Island: A Botanical Classification and the Scientists Who Study It

Related Articles

Vegetation classification is a complex and often ‍subjective process, ⁢influenced by various perspectives. The 4th EDGG Field Workshop in Sicily highlighted these‍ challenges, emphasizing⁣ the importance⁢ of collaborative observation and​ continuous refinement of ecological definitions⁣ in an ever-changing landscape.

The man standing on ‌a ⁢slope⁢ of sunburnt​ clay, contemplating the classification of ⁣vegetation, knew that it ⁣was ‌an act of faith disguised as method.Like all ‍faiths, it required ritual and a shared language​ among ​its practitioners. Though, he also recognized that this faith was frequently enough betrayed by arithmetic ⁣limitations such as too few observers and too many⁣ species compressed into small plots.

In 2012, during‌ the EDGG ‌Field Workshop in Sicily, this unease led ⁢to the idea of inviting outsiders – Central and⁢ Northern European vegetation ecologists with different⁢ perspectives – to observe Mediterranean vegetation through their eyes. This experiment aimed to challenge preconceived notions about classifications and possibly lead to more ⁣honest interpretations.

The ⁣workshop took ‌place on various substrates across the island including coastal sands, inland clays, volcanic soils, and evaporitic hills. Every terricolous⁤ autotrophic organism was recorded⁣ in ⁢small plots with intense scrutiny usually reserved for more⁣ anthropocentric ecosystems. This approach sparked technical and philosophical discussions about community identification.

Through this workshop’s collaborative⁤ efforts came new insights into Mediterranean⁤ vegetation classification. It became⁢ clear that there is no single ⁣correct way to classify vegetation; rather ⁤it is indeed a constantly evolving negotiation between climate, soil conditions disturbance events chance occurrences over time.

One example from the workshop​ involved two‍ competing ‌classifications for dry grasslands: Lygeo-Stipetea versus Stipo-Trachynietea ⁤or Ammophilion⁣ versus Alkanno-Maresion nanae. Through careful observation by both⁣ Central European ecologists accustomed to⁢ recording every detectable species ⁤within a plot‌ (including mosses and lichens)‍ as well as Mediterranean ecologists who focused ​on​ dominant ⁤plant​ species ⁢only, it‌ was⁢ discovered that these ​classifications were ‌not mutually exclusive. Instead, they represented ⁣different aspects of the same⁢ vegetation community.

This ‍workshop also emphasized ⁢the⁤ importance of considering current statistics‌ and examples in vegetation‍ classification. By ⁣bringing together‌ ecologists from different backgrounds ‌and perspectives, ​new‌ insights were gained​ and existing definitions ‍were refined. This ‌collaborative approach to ‍observation and classification is crucial in an ever-changing ⁣landscape​ where traditional ‍methods may⁢ no longer be sufficient.

the ‌4th EDGG Field Workshop in Sicily⁤ highlighted the complexities ​of⁢ vegetation‌ classification⁢ while​ promoting a collaborative approach to observation and continuous refinement of ecological definitions. By⁣ challenging preconceived ⁢notions ⁣and incorporating​ diverse⁣ perspectives, we⁤ can gain ‍a more comprehensive ⁢understanding of‍ our ever-evolving natural world.

The search for ​a suitable ⁤location for​ a nested plot in ⁣the dry grasslands ‌on ⁤the eastern flank of Mt. Etna ‍(Sant’Alfio) at 1200 m above sea level was captured ​by Iwona Dembicz ‌in 2012. This photo serves⁤ as‌ a⁢ reminder that the outcome of the ⁢4th EDGG Field Workshop was not just a scientific paper,but also​ an ⁢experience of shared protocols,discussions,and new perspectives.

The story has been told before – analyses revealing higher ‌diversity than expected, blurred boundaries where classification schemes ‌promised clarity, and clusters‌ that made ecological sense without offering metaphysical comfort. The⁣ separation between annual and perennial grasslands, so ​carefully upheld in Mediterranean‌ sampling ⁤tradition, would not emerge⁢ cleanly when confronted with comprehensive data. ⁢And yet, this time ​it⁣ was⁣ different.

As the team ⁤gathered ⁤on Mt.Etna for the 4th EDGG ⁢Field Workshop, ​they⁤ were‍ aware that objectivity in vegetation science is not an endpoint ‍to be reached ‌but rather‌ a direction ⁤to strive towards.It is indeed like walking towards the horizon across Sicilian hills – one knows it ‌will never be ‍reached but‍ still moves forward with determination.

The decision to organize⁣ an international field ⁤workshop may seem⁤ strategic or⁢ confident from an⁤ outsider’s viewpoint. ⁣However,⁢ it is actually an existential gesture – acknowledging that if⁣ classification is​ inherently subjective then⁣ multiple viewpoints must be considered; if approximation is⁢ inevitable then it should at least be ⁣done together.

In reality,vegetation does not care‍ how it⁣ is classified.But vegetation ecologists do care deeply about their⁣ work and ‍its impact on understanding biodiversity patterns and​ syntaxonomy.

Group photo of the botanists from the  4th EDGG Field​ Workshop in Mt. Etna
In spring, there was still a bit of snow on Mt. Etna,‍ giving the team of the th ⁤EDGG Field Workshop⁤ the chance to present themselves in front of the EDGG logo carved in the snow.‌ Photo credit: Thomas ‌Becker, th

New‍ study:

The results and insights from this​ workshop were published by Guarino et al. () in their paper​ titled ⁣”Dry grasslands ‍of​ Sicily: Multi-taxon diversity‍ and classification challenges” in the journal vegetation ⁤Classification and ‌Survey. The authors, who ⁤had been working on this project‌ for years, were able to‍ articulate the tensions between objectivity and subjectivity in vegetation ⁢science with composure. They acknowledged both the power⁢ and limitations of any classification system.

The 4th EDGG‌ Field Workshop was not just about producing a ​scientific paper. ⁢It​ was ⁤an experience of shared protocols, ⁤discussions, and new perspectives. This ​workshop‌ confirmed a ⁢long-held suspicion that​ objectivity is not a destination but rather a⁤ direction ⁣to strive towards.

The decision to organize an international ‌field workshop may⁣ seem strategic or confident from an outsider’s perspective. However,​ it is actually an⁢ existential gesture – acknowledging that if classification is inherently ​subjective then ⁤multiple viewpoints must be considered; ⁣if‌ approximation is inevitable then it should at⁤ least be⁣ done together.

In reality, vegetation does not care how it is ​indeed classified. But ‌vegetation ecologists ⁤do care deeply about their work and its impact on understanding biodiversity ⁤patterns ⁣and syntaxonomy.

Group ⁣photo ‌of the botanists from the  4th EDGG⁤ Field Workshop in mt.Etna ⁣
In spring,​ there was still a bit of snow on Mt. Etna, giving ‌the team⁤ of the⁤ th ‌ EDGG Field Workshop the chance to present themselves in front of the EDGG logo carved ‍in ‍the snow. Photo credit: Thomas ‍becker, ⁣ th

New ⁣study:

If you are ⁤interested in‍ learning more about how this diverse group of botanists combined their​ contrasting viewpoints ⁤into a ⁢joint perspective after thirteen years since their field sampling ​on Mt. Etna, please ‍read Guarino ‌et al.’s () paper titled “Dry grasslands of Sicily: ‌Multi-taxon diversity and classification challenges” published in Vegetation Classification⁤ and Survey. Additionally,Dengler et al.’s () paper provides more details about their sampling methodology.

The EDGG Field Workshops ‍have been instrumental⁣ in contributing to our understanding of ⁤the diversity‌ patterns of Palaearctic ⁣open habitats. You can find more ⁤details about these workshops on the EDGG webpage at https://edgg.org/fw/overview. The grassplot Diversity ‌Explorer​ (https://edgg.org/databases/GrasslandDiversityExplorer) is also a valuable resource for understanding the ‌contributions of these workshops‍ to ⁣our knowledge of biodiversity ⁤patterns.

Since its inception ⁣in 2009, there ⁣have been 21‍ EDGG​ Field Workshops,⁣ with many resulting in ‍influential papers on biodiversity patterns and​ syntaxonomy.Such as, Turtureanu et al.’s () paper and Cancellieri et al.’s () paper ‍both‌ emerged ​from previous field workshops. ‍In , two successful field⁣ workshops were held in ⁤Italy and Finland ⁢(Miskova et ⁢al., ). In ⁢ there will be one or​ two more field workshops,including one in conjunction with the Eurasian Grassland Conference ‍in Bulgaria (Vynokurov et al., 2025).If⁤ you are interested in learning more about these upcoming events,please visit the EDGG webpage‍ or contact Jürgen dengler,Deputy field Workshop Coordinator.

References:

  • Dengler, J., Becker, T., Ruprecht ERewritten Article:

    The study conducted by Becker et al. (2012)‌ focused on the Festuco-Brometea communities found in the⁤ Transylvanian Plateau⁤ of⁢ Romania. The research provided⁢ a ‌preliminary overview of the syntaxonomy, ecology, and biodiversity of these grasslands.⁢ However, ⁤recent studies have shown that there is⁣ a need​ to reassess plant diversity and composition in grasslands across different spatial scales‍ (Dengler et al., 2016). ⁣This led to ‌the development of a standardized sampling methodology‌ by⁤ EDGG (eurasian Dry‍ Grassland Group) for assessing⁣ plant diversity ‌and composition ⁤in grasslands.

    In ‌2021,⁤ García-Mijangos ⁣et ‌al. conducted a study on ⁣the Festuco-brometea communities in Navarre, Spain.Their research focused ‌on classifying​ these grasslands⁣ using a⁤ hierarchical expert system and ‍characterizing them based on their ⁣vegetation⁤ composition.

    Another study⁢ by ⁤Guarino⁤ et ⁢al. (2012) explored⁤ the community composition and diversity of Mediterranean grasslands during the 4th⁣ EDGG ‍Research Expedition to ⁤Sicily. They found⁤ that these dry grasslands are home to diverse plant species but also face ⁤classification challenges due to their multi-taxon nature.

    In ⁢2022, Guarino et al. published an ‌article discussing how plant communities and synusiae can ⁣be used as ⁤tools for ‌creating sustainable ⁤classifications for vegetation types.

    A follow-up ⁣study⁤ by Guarino et al. (2025) focused specifically ⁤on dry grasslands in Sicily and examined their ​multi-taxon diversity while addressing classification ⁢challenges.

    Miskova et al.’s ⁢(2025) research provided insights​ into the ⁣diversity ​of open habitats in Finland’s Turku Archipelago through observations made during an EDGG field Workshop⁢ held from June 28th to July 6th, 2025.

    Turtureanu et al.’s ⁤(2014) study looked at⁣ scale- and taxon-dependent biodiversity patterns in dry⁢ grassland vegetation in Transylvania, Romania.

    In 2024,​ Vynokurov et al. conducted‌ a study ​on the dry ‍grasslands and thorn-cushion communities ⁣of armenia,providing a first syntaxonomic classification for these ⁢vegetation types.

    The EDGG ⁤field Workshop‍ held in pirin Mountains, Bulgaria from July 14th to 18th, 2026 was announced by Vynokurov et al. (2025).

    these studies highlight ⁤the importance of reassessing plant diversity and⁢ composition in ​grasslands across different spatial scales and developing standardized ​methodologies for their assessment. They also emphasize the need ⁣for‌ sustainable⁢ classifications that take into account ‍the multi-taxon nature⁣ of these ecosystems.

More on this topic

Comments

Leave a Reply to Byrd Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Advertismentspot_img

Popular stories